AI-operated platform. All claim analysis, ratings and summaries on this site are produced by automated AI systems — not by human journalists.

Malta General Election · 30 May 2026

Every campaign promise, scored by AI for feasibility.

An automated, non-partisan tracker of pledges from PL, PN and ADPD as they are reported. Each promise is weighed against publicly available fiscal, legal and structural evidence — and given a verdict on whether it could realistically be delivered in one legislative term.

Source-led
Methodology published
Corrections policy
Public-interest archive

Reader-powered

Spotted a pledge we haven’t covered?

AI reality check

Who is selling a dream?

Aggregate AI feasibility of each party's tracked pledges, penalised for opacity: parties that have only revealed a sliver of their manifesto take points off — hidden plans can't be checked.

Full scoreboard
#1
Momentum
Momentum — Bidla ta' Vera
247 pledges assessed
84%realistic
Real way forward
Manifesto100% revealed
#2
ADPD
ADPD — The Green Party
372 pledges assessed
72%realistic10
Real way forward
Manifestono public total
#3
PL
Partit Laburista
51 pledges assessed
42%realistic33
Mixed bag
Manifesto5% revealed
#4
PN
Partit Nazzjonalista
132 pledges assessed
35%realistic26
Mixed bag
Manifesto24% revealed

Updated daily

The latest pledges, fact-checked.

Every new promise from PL, PN and ADPD is scored by AI for fiscal, legal and delivery feasibility — refreshed each day through polling.

See every pledge
PLElderly Care

Increase the grant for senior citizens by another €200.

AI feasibilityCostly
DeliverableStretchUnlikely

Increasing a universal grant for senior citizens, a large demographic, by €200 will have a substantial recurrent cost, impacting the national budget significantly.

Source · Partit Laburista — Pledges (intmalta.com)
PNPopulation

Introduce a clear population policy to give the country direction.

AI feasibilityPartially feasible
DeliverableStretchUnlikely

Developing a population policy is feasible, however, its implementation and effectiveness would depend heavily on consensus, ongoing economic conditions, and public acceptance, which can be challenging and require sustained effort beyond a single term.

Source · PN Official Site - A clear population policy to give our country direction
PNEnvironment

Introduce a National Park Designation and Protection Act, building on Natura 2000.

AI feasibilityFeasible
DeliverableStretchUnlikely

Legislating a National Park Designation and Protection Act is a procedural and legal measure that can be achieved within a single legislative term. Its effectiveness would depend on subsequent enforcement and funding, but the act itself is deliverable.

Source · PN Official Site - A Breeze and a Fresh Start into Public Open Spaces
PNEconomy

Develop new sustainable sectors that attract meaningful wealth to the country.

AI feasibilityPartially feasible
DeliverableStretchUnlikely

While the intention to develop new sustainable sectors is positive, the actualisation of this pledge depends on market forces, international economic conditions, and significant investment and policy implementation, making full delivery within one term partially feasible.

Source · PN Official Site - An Economy That Innovates
PNInfrastructure

Create reliable, comfortable, and well-connected alternatives to the traditional way of life to reduce commuting time and daily stress.

AI feasibilityCostly
DeliverableStretchUnlikely

Developing reliable and well-connected infrastructure alternatives (e.g., public transport, cycling networks) is a significant undertaking that requires substantial capital investment and long-term planning, likely extending beyond a single term and incurring considerable recurrent costs.

Source · PN Official Site - Win Back Your Precious Time

Beyond the campaign

Other claims from Maltese public life.

Statements from politicians, officials and viral content checked against the public record — independent of the election cycle.

Browse the full archive

The AI process

A transparent AI ledger, not a verdict on people.

01.

AI claim capture

Our AI pipeline ingests speeches, press releases, parliamentary records and recorded media and isolates specific, verifiable factual statements. Opinions, predictions and rhetorical flourishes are filtered out.

02.

AI evidence audit

The model cross-references each statement against primary sources where available — official datasets, legislative records and original documents — supplemented by reliable secondary reporting. Every source it relies on is published on the claim page.

03.

AI-generated verdict

The AI assigns a verdict strictly against the weight of cited evidence and writes a plain-language explanation. Ratings are updated openly when new evidence emerges. AI can make mistakes — readers can challenge any rating via the corrections page.

Credibility scale

Six levels — designed for nuance.

Public claims rarely fit a binary true/false. Our six-level scale gives credit for partial truths and flags missing context, while reserving the strongest labels for the strongest evidence.

Accurate

The claim is fully supported by credible primary evidence with no material omissions.

Mostly Accurate

Broadly supported by evidence but contains minor caveats or missing detail.

Needs Context

Factually correct in isolation but omits context that materially changes the meaning.

Misleading

Selectively combines or frames facts in a way that leads readers to a false conclusion.

Unsupported

We could not locate credible evidence to substantiate the claim at the time of publication.

False

Directly contradicted by primary sources and reliable documentation.

Methodology

How we choose what to review and how we rate it.

Read the methodology

Corrections

Our commitment to transparent updates and reader-led corrections.

Read the corrections policy